Maximum instruction accounts
- Idea
- Draft
- Review
- Accept
- Implement
- Active
Decision brief
Why this proposal matters
This SIMD imposes a hard restriction on the maximum number of account references that an instruction may declare. There is already a limit of 255 account references imposed during serialization in ABI v0 and v1, but it does not currently apply to builtin invocations or precompiles.
Proposal at a glance
What changes
- A new verification step must be included in message sanitization for message formats legacy and v0. The verification step must examine every instruction in a transaction, check if the former references more than 255 accounts, and throw an error otherwise. Transactions violating such a restriction must be considered invalid and not included in a block.…
- This SIMD imposes a hard restriction on the maximum number of account references that an instruction may declare. There is already a limit of 255 account references imposed during serialization in ABI v0 and v1, but it does not currently apply to builtin invocations or precompiles.
Stakeholder map
Who is affected
Builders & client teams Medium impact
Calls to user deployed programs from top level instructions and CPIs will not be impacted, since there is already a limit in place.
Action requirement unknownValidators & operators Impact unknown
No proposal-specific evidence was found for this group.
Action requirement unknownUsers & stakers Medium impact
Calls to user deployed programs from top level instructions and CPIs will not be impacted, since there is already a limit in place.
Action requirement unknownGovernance & ecosystem Impact unknown
No proposal-specific evidence was found for this group.
Action requirement unknownExact source revision
Full proposal document
0616093b2952Summary
This SIMD imposes a hard restriction on the maximum number of account references that an instruction may declare. There is already a limit of 255 account references imposed during serialization in ABI v0 and v1, but it does not currently apply to builtin invocations or precompiles.
Motivation
Although there can only be a maximum of 35 account keys in the legacy message
format and 256 in the v0 format, instructions can have up to 65535 (u16::MAX)
accounts, each being a u8 index referencing a transaction account.
Allowing instructions to reference more accounts than what the message format allows is not necessary. On one hand there is a limit of 255 accounts for CPI and user deployed programs, on the other, builtins and precompiles do not need as many accounts as the message format allows.
Furthermore, since there can only be 256 unique pubkeys in a transaction, any instruction referencing more than 256 will have aliased references, requiring the validator to deduplicate them, even though they are unused.
New Terminology
None.
Detailed Design
A new verification step must be included in message sanitization for message formats legacy and v0. The verification step must examine every instruction in a transaction, check if the former references more than 255 accounts, and throw an error otherwise. Transactions violating such a restriction must be considered invalid and not included in a block. Likewise, blocks containing transactions that violate such condition should be declared dead.
Transactions in the v1 format (SIMD-0385) already have a limit of 255 accounts per instruction, so this change and the accompanying feature gate do not affect such newer format.
Alternatives Considered
None.
Impact
Calls to user deployed programs from top level instructions and CPIs will not be impacted, since there is already a limit in place.
Instructions that invoke builtin programs or precompiles will error out if they have more than 255 accounts.
Security Considerations
None.
Evidence graph
Related proposals and rollout
One or more sources are unavailable.
Upstream review record
Upstream discussion & review
No verified upstream discussion was found. simd.watch does not invent a discussion link.
Provenance
Evidence & technical details
Rollout or chain data, source revisions, freshness and integrity. 2
Provenance
Evidence & technical details
Rollout or chain data, source revisions, freshness and integrity.SIMD
Deployment Status
DqbnFPASg7tHmZ6qfpdrt2M6MWoSeiicWPXxPhxqFCQExact source revision
Sources & integrity
- Proposal document pinned_commit_blob
0616093b2952ed6de52c4a27d66aadd11d48d4f9 - simd-document document · stale · Sep 9, 2026
0616093b2952ed6de52c4a27d66aadd11d48d4f9
One or more sources are unavailable.
simd.watch community discussion · SIMD-0406
Powered by Giscus · Sign in with GitHub to comment
Community comments load when this section approaches the viewport.