Skip to main content
Technical proposal SIMD-0096 Activated

Reward full priority fee to validator

  1. Idea
  2. Draft
  3. Review
  4. Accept
  5. Implement
  6. Active

Decision brief

Why this proposal matters

Reward 100% of priority fee to validator.

Source-backed reading aid · source language: EN

Proposal at a glance

What changes

  • When calculate fee for SanitizedMessage, it should separate prioritization_fee from transaction fee.
  • change FeeStructure.calculate_fee()
  • During fee collection, priority fees are accumulated separately from transaction fees;

Stakeholder map

Who is affected

Builders & client teams Impact unknown

No proposal-specific evidence was found for this group.

Action requirement unknown
Validators & operators Medium impact

The implemented proposal aims to enhance incentives for validators to prioritize transactions with higher priority fees, thereby providing more substantial compensation for the validators' efforts in processing higher-paying transactions.

Action requirement unknown
Users & stakers Medium impact

The implemented proposal aims to enhance incentives for validators to prioritize transactions with higher priority fees, thereby providing more substantial compensation for the validators' efforts in processing higher-paying transactions.

Action requirement unknown
Governance & ecosystem Medium impact

The implemented proposal aims to enhance incentives for validators to prioritize transactions with higher priority fees, thereby providing more substantial compensation for the validators' efforts in processing higher-paying transactions.

Action requirement unknown

Exact source revision

Full proposal document

Source-language document. Technical identifiers and evidence remain unchanged. 0616093b2952

Summary

Reward 100% of priority fee to validator.

Motivation

To better align validator incentives, priority fee should change from current 50% burn 50% reward to 100% reward to validator.

Alternatives Considered

Current 50-50% model is an alternative, which does not fully align with validator's incentive, and encourages side deals.

New Terminology

None

Detailed Design

  • When calculate fee for SanitizedMessage, it should separate prioritization_fee from transaction fee.

    • change FeeStructure.calculate_fee()
  • During fee collection, priority fees are accumulated separately from transaction fees;

    • change bank.collector_fees and bank.filter_program_errors_and_collect_fee()
  • When distributing collected fees, the collector_id receives the sum of priority fees. Logic for distributing base transaction fees is unchanged.

    • Change bank.distribute_transaction_fee()
  • No change to fee payer account validation;

  • No change to how much transaction would be paying in total;

Impact

The implemented proposal aims to enhance incentives for validators to prioritize transactions with higher priority fees, thereby providing more substantial compensation for the validators' efforts in processing higher-paying transactions.

Security Considerations

None

Drawbacks

By paying the complete priority fee to their own accounts, leaders can now inflate the reported priority fees in their blocks artificially, incurring minimal costs. Previously, burning a portion of the priority fees deincentivized such behavior. The artificial inflation of fees could lead wallets to overestimate the required priority fee.

Backwards Compatibility

The implementation of this proposal necessitates the use of a feature gate. Although there will be no alteration to the transaction submitter's payment structure, the software incorporating the proposal will allocate a greater portion of fees to the leader compared to other versions. Consequently, a feature gate is essential to ensure that all validators transition to the new functionality at the epoch boundary, thereby preserving consensus.

Evidence graph

Related proposals and rollout

One or more sources are unavailable.

Upstream review record

Upstream discussion & review

One or more sources are unavailable.

simd.watch community discussion · SIMD-0096

Powered by Giscus · Sign in with GitHub to comment

Community comments load when this section approaches the viewport.

Provenance

Evidence & technical details

Rollout or chain data, source revisions, freshness and integrity.
2

SIMD

Deployment Status

Document lifecycleActivated
CategoryCore protocol
Devnetactive Epoch 805
Testnetactive Epoch 744
Mainnet-Betaactive Epoch 741
3opE3EzAKnUftUDURkzMgwpNgimBAypW1mNDYH4x4Zg7

Exact source revision

Sources & integrity

  • Proposal document pinned_commit_blob
    0616093b2952ed6de52c4a27d66aadd11d48d4f9
  • simd-document document · current · Sep 11, 2026
    0616093b2952ed6de52c4a27d66aadd11d48d4f9

One or more sources are unavailable.

One or more sources are unavailable.